Chiral d-wave superconductivity on the honeycomb lattice close to the Mott state
Annica M. Black-Schaffer, Wei Wu, Karyn Le Hur
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.054521 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study superconductivity on the honeycomb lattice close to the Mott state at half filling. Due to the sixfold lattice symmetry and disjoint Fermi surfaces at opposite momenta, we show that several different fully gapped superconducting states naturally exist on the honeycomb lattice, of which the chiral d+id′-wave state has previously been shown to appear when superconductivity appears close to the Mott state. Using renormalized mean-field theory to study the t−J model and quantum Monte Carlo calculations of the Hubbard-U model we show that the d+id′-wave state is the favored superconducting state for a wide range of on-site repulsion U, from the intermediate to the strong coupling regime. We also investigate the possibility of a mixed chirality d-wave state, where the overall chirality cancels. We find that a state with d+id′-wave symmetry in one valley but d−id′-wave symmetry in the other valley is not possible in the t−J model without reducing the translational symmetry, due to the zero-momentum and spin-singlet nature of the superconducting order parameter. Moreover, any extended unit cells result either in disjoint Dirac points, which cannot harbor this mixed chirality state, or the two valleys are degenerate at the zone center, where valley hybridization prevents different superconducting condensates. We also investigate extended unit cells where the overall chirality cancels in real space. For supercells containing up to eight sites, including the Kekulé distortion, we find no energetically favorable d-wave solution with an overall zero chirality within the restriction of the t−J model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In3Cu2VO9 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrIrO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrPtAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Na2IrO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li2IrO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Chiral d-wave superconductivity on the honeycomb lattice close to the Mott state
similarity 0.94Annica M. Black-Schaffer et al. · 2014 · arXiv:1407.2914
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Competing chiral d-wave superconductivity and magnetic phases in the strong-coupling Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice
similarity 0.94F. G. Ribeiro et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Chiral d-wave superconductivity in doped graphene
similarity 0.92Annica M. Black-Schaffer & Carsten Honerkamp · 2014 · arXiv:1406.0101
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Excitonic and superconducting orders from repulsive interaction on the doped honeycomb bilayer
similarity 0.91James M. Murray & Oskar Vafek · 2013 · arXiv:1312.6831
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex lattice for a holographic superconductor
similarity 0.88Kengo Maeda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting instability of the resonating-valence-bond state
similarity 0.87V. N. Muthukumar
Source status unknown — claims are unverified