← Back to search

Lower critical field and SNS-Andreev spectroscopy of 122-arsenides: Evidence of nodeless superconducting gap

M. Abdel-Hafiez, P. J. Pereira, S. A. Kuzmichev, T. E. Kuzmicheva, V. M. Pudalov, L. Harnagea, A. A. Kordyuk, A. V. Silhanek, V. V. Moshchalkov, B. Shen, Hai-Hu Wen, A. N. Vasiliev, Xiao-Jia Chen

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.054524 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Using two experimental techniques, we studied single crystals of the 122-FeAs family with almost the same critical temperature, Tc. We investigated the temperature dependence of the lower critical field Hc1(T) of a Ca0.32Na0.68Fe2As2 (Tc≈34K) single crystal under static magnetic fields H parallel to the c axis. The temperature dependence of the London penetration depth can be described equally well either by a single anisotropic s-wave-like gap or by a two-gap model, while a d-wave approach cannot be used to fit the London penetration depth data. Intrinsic multiple Andreev reflection effect spectroscopy was used to detect bulk gap values in single crystals of the intimate compound Ba0.65K0.35Fe2As2, with the same Tc. We estimated the range of the large gap value ΔL=6–8 meV (depending on small variation of Tc) and its a k space anisotropy of about 30%, and the small gap ΔS≈1.7±0.3 meV. This clearly indicates that the gap structure of our investigated systems more likely corresponds to a nodeless s-wave two gaps.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
Ca0.32Na0.68Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

34Pressure not reportedonset
Ba0.65K0.35Fe2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

34Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers