Distribution of electrons and holes in cuprate superconductors as determined from 17O and Cu63 nuclear magnetic resonance
Michael Jurkutat, Damian Rybicki, Oleg P. Sushkov, Grant V. M. Williams, Andreas Erb, Jürgen Haase
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.140504 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The local distribution of electrons and holes in the CuO2 plane of the high-temperature superconducting cuprates is determined with nuclear magnetic resonance through the quadrupole splittings of 17O and Cu63. Based on new data for single crystals of electron-doped Pr2−xCexCuO4 (x=0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15) as well as Nd2−xCexCuO4 (x=0, 0.13) the changes in hole contents nd of Cu 3dx2−y2 and np of O 2pσ orbitals are determined and these account for the stoichiometrically doped charges, similar to hole-doped La2−xSrxCuO4. It emerges that while nd+2np=1 in all parent materials as expected, nd and np vary substantially between different groups of materials. Doping holes increases predominantly np, but also nd. To the contrary, doping electrons predominantly decreases nd and only slightly np. However, np for the electron-doped systems is higher than that in hole-doped La1.85Sr0.15CuO4. Cuprates with the highest maximum Tc's appear to have a comparatively low nd and high np. The rather high oxygen hole content of the Pr2CuO4 and Nd2CuO4 with the low nd seems to make them ideal candidates for hole doping to obtain a potentially high Tc.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pr2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd2-xCexCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.85Sr0.15CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7-δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Relaxation of nuclear magnetic moments and site-selective NMR in d-wave superconductors
similarity 0.97Robert E. Throckmorton & Oskar Vafek
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strong magnetic fields on pairing fluctuations in high-temperature superconductors
similarity 0.97M. Eschrig et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin transport through a ferromagnet/insulator/unconventional superconductor junction
similarity 0.96Gaetano Annunziata et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Generalization of interlayer tunneling models to cuprate superconductors with charge density waves
similarity 0.96Hércules Santana & E. V. L. de Mello
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density of states modulations from oxygen phonons in d-wave superconductors: Reconciling angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy
similarity 0.96S. Johnston & T. P. Devereaux
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Oxygen hole symmetry and banding in cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.96L. F. Mattheiss & D. R. Hamann
Source status unknown — claims are unverified