Single fermion manipulation via superconducting phase differences in multiterminal Josephson junctions
B. van Heck, S. Mi, A. R. Akhmerov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155450 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We show how the superconducting phase difference in a Josephson junction may be used to split the Kramers degeneracy of its energy levels and to remove all the properties associated with time-reversal symmetry. The superconducting phase difference is known to be ineffective in two-terminal short Josephson junctions, where irrespective of the junction structure the induced Kramers degeneracy splitting is suppressed and the ground state fermion parity must stay even, so that a protected zero-energy Andreev level crossing may never appear. Our main result is that these limitations can be completely avoided by using multiterminal Josephson junctions. There the Kramers degeneracy breaking becomes comparable to the superconducting gap, and applying phase differences may cause the change of the ground state fermion parity from even to odd. We prove that the necessary condition for the appearance of a fermion parity switch is the presence of a “discrete vortex” in the junction: the situation when the phases of the superconducting leads wind by 2π. Our approach offers strategies for creation of Majorana bound states as well as spin manipulation. Our proposal can be implemented using any low density, high spin-orbit material such as InAs quantum wells, and can be detected using standard tools.
Similar papers
Microwave spectroscopy of Josephson junctions in topological superconductors
similarity 0.87Pauli Virtanen & Patrik Recher
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge and spin supercurrents in triplet superconductor--ferromagnet--singlet superconductor Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87P. M. R. Brydon et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1305.0211
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Voltage control of superconducting exchange interaction and anomalous Josephson effect
similarity 0.87Jabir Ali Ouassou & Jacob Linder · 2018 · arXiv:1810.02820
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of Majorana Fermion induced Fractional Josephson Effect
similarity 0.87K. T. Law & Patrick A. Lee · 2011 · arXiv:1103.5013
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Combined effect of Zeeman splitting and spin-orbit interaction on the Josephson current in a superconductor–two-dimensional electron gas–superconductor structure
similarity 0.86E. V. Bezuglyi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson current in diffusive multilayer superconductor/ferromagnet/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.86Iver B. Sperstad et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0808.3359
Source status unknown — claims are unverified