Hidden order as a source of interface superconductivity
Andreas Moor, Anatoly F. Volkov, Konstantin B. Efetov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.064511 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Interfacial superconductivity is observed in a variety of heterostructures composed of different materials including superconducting and nonsuperconducting (at appropriate doping and temperatures) cuprates and iron-based pnictides. The origin of this superconductivity remains in many cases unclear. Here, we propose a general mechanism of interfacial superconductivity for systems with competing order parameters. We assume that parameters characterizing the material allow formation of another order like charge- or spin-density wave competing and prevailing superconductivity in the bulk (hidden superconductivity). Diffusive electron scattering on the interface results in a suppression of this order and releasing the superconductivity. Our theory is based on the use of Ginzburg-Landau equations applicable to a broad class of systems. We demonstrate that the local superconductivity appears in the vicinity of the interface and the spatial dependence of the superconducting order parameter Δ(x) is described by the Gross-Pitaevskii equation. Solving this equation we obtain quantized values of temperature and doping levels at which Δ(x) appears. Remarkably, the local superconductivity shows up even in the case when the rival order is only slightly suppressed and may arise also on the surface of the sample (surface superconductivity).
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 21 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 50 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CaFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 30 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CaFeAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 49 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 77 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Optimal superconductivity in La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.95J.-S. Zhou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting junctions from doped nonsuperconducting CuO2 layers
similarity 0.95V. M. Loktev & Yu. G. Pogorelov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Weak magnetism in insulating and superconducting cuprates
similarity 0.95G. M. De Luca et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence for two coupled subsystems in the superconducting state of La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.95S. Rast et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalously sharp superconducting transitions in overdoped La2−xSrxCuO4 films
similarity 0.95T. R. Lemberger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Elucidating the magnetic and superconducting phases in the alkali metal intercalated iron chalcogenides
similarity 0.95Meng Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified