Numerical subgap spectroscopy of double quantum dots coupled to superconductors
Rok Žitko
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.165116 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Double quantum dot nanostructures embedded between two superconducting leads or in a superconducting ring have complex excitation spectra inside the gap which reveal the competition between different many-body phenomena. We study the corresponding two-impurity Anderson model using the nonperturbative numerical renormalization group (NRG) technique and identify the characteristic features in the spectral function in various parameter regimes. At half-filling, the system always has a singlet ground state. For large hybridization, we observe an inversion of excited interdot triplet and singlet states due to the level repulsion between two subgap singlet states. The Shiba doublet states split in two cases: (a) at nonzero superconducting phase difference and (b) away from half-filling. The most complex structure of subgap states is found when one or both dots are in the valence fluctuation regime. Doublet splitting can lead to a parity-changing quantum phase transition to a doublet ground state in some circumstances. In such cases, we observe very different spectral weights for the transitions to singlet or triplet excited Shiba states: the triplet state is best visible on the valence-fluctuating dot, while the singlets are more pronounced on the half-filled dot.
Similar papers
Subgap states spectroscopy in a quantum dot coupled to gapped hosts: Unified picture for superconductor and semiconductor bands
similarity 0.93Peter Zalom & Martin Žonda
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Subgap states in superconducting islands
similarity 0.90Luka Pavešić et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Finite-frequency noise in a quantum dot with normal and superconducting leads
similarity 0.89Stephanie Droste et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Subgap states in superconducting islands
similarity 0.89Luka Pavešić et al. · 2021 · arXiv:2101.10168
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Odd-triplet superconductivity in single-level quantum dots
similarity 0.88Stephan Weiss & Jürgen König
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Transient transport spectroscopy of an interacting quantum dot proximized by a superconductor: Charge and heat currents after a switch
similarity 0.87Lara C. Ortmanns et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified