Influence of the boundary conditions on the current flow pattern along a superconducting wire
Jorge Berger
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.064513 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study the patterns at which the current flow stabilizes in a finite 1D superconducting wire, for various experimentally reasonable boundary conditions, for small fixed current densities and temperatures close to Tc. We pay special attention to the possible existence of a stationary regime. If the contacts are superconducting, truly stationary or normal regimes do not exist, but can be approached as a limit. In the case of weak superconducting contacts, a rich phase diagram is found, with several periodic regimes that involve two phase slip centers. There may be a time lag between the phase slips at each of these centers. There is a small parameter region in which this time lag is continuously tuned by the parameters. For some of these regimes, the density of Cooper pairs does not have mirror symmetry. If the contacts are normal, the stationary regime is possible. Analysis according to the Kramer–Watts-Tobin formalism leads to qualitatively the same results as the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau model.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Phase boundary of superconducting networks: A new approximation scheme
similarity 0.96C. C. Chi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting wires and fractional flux
similarity 0.96C. A. R. Sá de Melo
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical quantum phase transitions in a mesoscopic superconducting system
similarity 0.96K. Wrześniewski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum phase diffusion in ac-driven superconducting atomic point contacts
similarity 0.96M. F. Carusela & J. Ankerhold
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-quantum-discretized dynamics of magnetic flux entry, exit, and annihilation in current-driven mesoscopic type-I superconductors
similarity 0.96G. R. Berdiyorov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex state and dynamics of a d-wave superconductor: Finite-element analysis
similarity 0.96Z. D. Wang & Qiang-Hua Wang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified