← Back to search

Electron doping dependence of the anisotropic superconductivity in BaFe2−xNixAs2

Zhaosheng Wang, Tao Xie, E. Kampert, T. Förster, Xingye Lu, Rui Zhang, Dongliang Gong, Shiliang Li, T. Herrmannsdörfer, J. Wosnitza, Huiqian Luo

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174509 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The upper critical field Hc2 in superconducting BaFe2−xNixAs2 single crystals has been determined by magnetotransport measurements down to 0.6 K over the whole superconducting dome with 0.065≤x≤0.22 for both the interplane (H∥c,Hc2c) and in-plane (H∥ab,Hc2ab) field directions in static magnetic fields up to 16 T and pulsed magnetic fields up to 60 T. The temperature dependence of Hc2ab follows the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg model incorporating orbital and spin paramagnetic effects, while Hc2c(T) can only be described by the effective two-band model with unbalanced diffusivity. The anisotropy of the upper critical fields, γ(T)=Hc2ab/Hc2c, monotonically increases with increasing temperature for all dopings, and its zero-temperature limit γ(0) has an asymmetric doping dependence with a significant enhancement in the overdoped regime, where the optimally doped compound has the most isotropic superconductivity. Our results suggest that the anisotropy in the superconductivity of iron pnictides is determined by the topology of the Fermi surfaces together with the doping-induced impurity scattering.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

11.3Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

13.7Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18.2Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe1.908Ni0.092As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19.3Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

19.9Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20.3Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

20.3Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

18.6Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

14.5Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

10.9Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe1.8Ni0.2As2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.4Pressure not reportedonset
BaFe2-xNixAs2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

3.4Pressure not reportedonset

Similar papers