Superconductivity versus bound-state formation in a two-band superconductor with small Fermi energy: Applications to Fe pnictides/chalcogenides and doped SrTiO3
Andrey V. Chubukov, Ilya Eremin, Dmitri V. Efremov
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.174516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We analyze the interplay between superconductivity and the formation of bound pairs of fermions (BCS-BEC crossover) in a 2D model of interacting fermions with small Fermi energy EF and weak attractive interaction, which extends to energies well above EF. The 2D case is special because a two-particle bound state forms at arbitrary weak interaction, and already at weak coupling, one has to distinguish between the bound-state formation and superconductivity. We briefly review the situation in the one-band model and then consider two different two-band models: one with one hole band and one electron band and another with two hole or two electron bands. In each case, we obtain the bound-state energy 2E0 for two fermions in a vacuum and solve the set of coupled equations for the pairing gaps and the chemical potentials to obtain the onset temperature of the pairing Tins and the quasiparticle dispersion at T=0. We then compute the superfluid stiffness ρs(T=0) and obtain the actual Tc. For definiteness, we set EF in one band to be near zero and consider different ratios of E0 and EF in the other band. We show that at EF≫E0, the behavior of both two-band models is BCS-like in the sense that Tc≈Tins≪EF and Δ∼Tc. At EF≪E0, the two models behave differently: in the model with two hole/two electron bands, Tins∼E0/lnE0EF, Δ∼(E0EF)1/2, and Tc∼EF, like in the one-band model. In between Tins and Tc, the system displays a preformed pair behavior. In the model with one hole and one electron bands, Tc remains of order Tins, and both remain finite at EF=0 and of the order of E0. The preformed pair behavior still does exist in this model because Tc is numerically smaller than Tins. For both models, we reexpress Tins in terms of the fully renormalized two-particle scattering amplitude by extending to the two-band case (the method pioneered by Gorkov and Melik-Barkhudarov back in 1961). We apply our results for the model with a hole and an electron band to Fe pnictides and Fe chalcogenides in which a superconducting gap has been detected on the bands that do not cross the Fermi level, and to FeSe, in which the superconducting gap is comparable to the Fermi energy. We apply the results for the model with two electron bands to Nb-doped SrTiO3 and argue that our theory explains the rapid increase of Tc when both bands start crossing the Fermi level.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiFe1-xCoxAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeTe0.6Se0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| SrTiO3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity near a Ferroelectric Quantum Critical Point in Ultralow-Density Dirac Materials
similarity 0.97Vladyslav Kozii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Synergetic Ferroelectricity and Superconductivity in Zero-Density Dirac Semimetals near Quantum Criticality
similarity 0.97Vladyslav Kozii et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Novel pairing mechanism for superconductivity at a vanishing level of doping driven by critical ferroelectric modes
similarity 0.97Yaron Kedem
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temperature dependence of the resonance and low-energy spin excitations in superconducting FeTe0.6Se0.4
similarity 0.96Leland W. Harriger et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin-orbit-coupled ferroelectric superconductivity
similarity 0.96Shota Kanasugi & Youichi Yanase
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional Multiband Superconductivity in Bulk SrTiO3 and LaAlO3/SrTiO3 Interfaces
similarity 0.96Thaís V. Trevisan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified