Impurity scattering effects on the superconducting properties and the tetragonal-to-orthorhombic phase transition in FeSe
M. Abdel-Hafiez, Y. J. Pu, J. Brisbois, R. Peng, D. L. Feng, D. A. Chareev, A. V. Silhanek, C. Krellner, A. N. Vasiliev, Xiao-Jia Chen
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.224508 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A comprehensive study of the doping dependence of the phase diagram of FeSe-based superconductors is still required due to the lack of a clean and systematic means of doping control. Here, we report on the magneto-optical imaging, thermodynamic and transport properties, as well as in situ angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) studies of impurity scattering in stoichiometric FeSe single crystals. Co doping at the Fe site is found to decrease the superconducting transition temperature (Tc). The upper critical field and specific heat all indicate a possible multiband superconductivity with strong coupling in the Co-doped system. A remarkable feature in FeSe is that its temperature dependent resistivity exhibits a wide hump at high temperatures, a signature of a crossover from a semiconductinglike behavior to metallic behavior. A structural tetragonal-to-orthorhombic phase transition (Ts) (a consequence of the electronic nematicity) is suppressed by either physical or chemical pressures. Due to the reconstruction of the Fermi surface at Ts, specific heat anomalies at Ts present ΔCp/Ts≈γn, being γn the Sommerfield coefficient at low temperature. This reflect an additional electronic instability in the FeSe1−xSx system. ARPES data between 180 and 282 K indicates the existence of a chemical potential shift with increasing thermal excitations, resulting in a change of the Fermi-surface topology and exhibiting a semimetal behavior. We found that the temperature-induced Lifshitz transition is much higher than the temperature for the nematic order.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Fe0.988Co0.012Se Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.5 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ba(Fe1-xCox)2As2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 26 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Synergy and competition between superconductivity and antiferromagnetism in FeSe under pressure
similarity 0.97Guan-Yu Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced superconducting transition temperature in hyper-interlayer-expanded FeSe despite the suppressed electronic nematic order and spin fluctuations
similarity 0.97Matevž Majcen Hrovat et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of superconductivity to competing magnetic phases in tetragonal FeS
similarity 0.96Franziska K. K. Kirschner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Robustness of superconducting properties to transition metal substitution and impurity phases in Fe1−xVxSe
similarity 0.96Franziska K. K. Kirschner et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of strain on the electronic structure, superconductivity, and nematicity in FeSe studied by angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy
similarity 0.96G. N. Phan et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeSe: The Role of Nematic Order
similarity 0.96Jian Kang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified