Interplay of screening and superconductivity in low-dimensional materials
G. Schönhoff, M. Rösner, R. E. Groenewald, S. Haas, T. O. Wehling
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.134504 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A quantitative description of Coulomb interactions is developed for two-dimensional superconducting materials, enabling us to compare intrinsic with external screening effects, such as those due to substrates. Using the example of a doped monolayer of MoS2 embedded in a tunable dielectric environment, we demonstrate that the influence of external screening is limited to a length scale, bounded from below by the effective thickness of the quasi-two-dimensional material and from above by its intrinsic screening length. As a consequence, it is found that unconventional Coulomb-driven superconductivity cannot be induced in MoS2 by tuning the substrate properties alone. Our calculations of the retarded Morel-Anderson Coulomb potential μ* reveal that the Coulomb interactions, renormalized by the reduced layer thickness and the substrate properties, can shift the onset of the electron-phonon driven superconducting phase in monolayer MoS2 but do not significantly affect the critical temperature at optimal doping.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeSe Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 100 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 10 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| MoS2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Distinct Electronic Origins of Superconductivity and Nematicity in FeSe
similarity 0.96Xueying Ma et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity without a hole pocket in electron-doped FeSe: Analysis beyond the Migdal-Eliashberg formalism
similarity 0.95Youichi Yamakawa & Hiroshi Kontani
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing the direct factor for superconductivity in FeSe-Based Superconductors by Raman Scattering
similarity 0.95Anmin Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in FeSe Thin Films Driven by the Interplay between Nematic Fluctuations and Spin-Orbit Coupling
similarity 0.95Jian Kang & Rafael M. Fernandes
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of superconductivity in ultrathin layers of FeSe synthesized on a topological insulator
similarity 0.95Andreas Eich et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Theoretical prediction of superconductivity in intrinsic and hydrogenated transition metal mononitride monolayers
similarity 0.94Shiye Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified