Uniaxial strain effects on the superconducting transition in Re-doped Hg-1223 cuprate superconductors
Masaki Mito, Kazuma Ogata, Hiroki Goto, Kazuki Tsuruta, Kazuma Nakamura, Hiroyuki Deguchi, Tomoya Horide, Kaname Matsumoto, Takayuki Tajiri, Hiroshi Hara, Toshinori Ozaki, Hiroyuki Takeya, Yoshihiko Takano
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.064503 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effects of uniaxial strain and hydrostatic pressure on Hg0.83Re0.18Ba2Ca2.4Cu3.6O14[Hg0.83(Re0.18)−1223] were investigated by ac magnetic measurements under stress corresponding to a pressure of 20 GPa at maximum. According to a previous thermal study based on the Ehrenfest relation, in-plane contraction should increase the superconducting transition temperature Tc, whereas out-of-plane contraction should decrease Tc. This suggests that the increase in Tc under hydrostatic-pressure contraction must be smaller than that under in-plane contraction. However, the present uniaxial-strain experiments revealed enhancement of Tc under both in-plane and out-of-plane contraction, and the largest enhancement was observed under hydrostatic-pressure contraction. According to a band calculation, all contraction styles induce hole doping from the HgO blocks to the CuO2 blocks, and hydrostatic-pressure contraction yields the largest hole doping among three contractions. This behavior explains well a series of changes in Tc in the stress region of below 8 GPa. More specifically, under hydrostatic-pressure contraction, Tc exhibited an increase, a decrease, and another increase with increasing pressure, and this multistep change is similar to that observed in Bi-2223-type cuprate superconductors, suggesting that it is necessary to distinguish the effect of strain on the middle CuO2 plane in the three-CuO2-plane package from that on the outer planes.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hg0.83Re0.18Ba2Ca2.4Cu3.6O14 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 129 | Pressure unresolved | onset |
| Hg0.83Re0.18Ba2Ca2.4Cu3.6O14 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 135.5 | 10.3 GPa | onset |
Similar papers
Resistivity study of the pseudogap phase for (Hg,Re)-1223 superconductors
similarity 0.96C. A. C. Passos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Scanning tunneling microscopy studies of the cuprate superconductor HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ
similarity 0.95Fan Zhang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Thermoelectric power and resistivity measurements on oxygen-annealed HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ superconductors
similarity 0.94C. K. Subramaniam et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Muon spin relaxation in Re-substituted HgA2Can−1CunO2n+2+x (A=Sr,Ba; n=2,3) superconductors
similarity 0.94L. Fàbrega et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
ac response of Hg-based superconductors: Surface barrier and bulk pinning contributions
similarity 0.94L. Fàbrega et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Establishment of strongly overdoped states in the HgBa2Ca2Cu3O8+δ superconductor
similarity 0.94K. Fujinami et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified