Andreev bound states in superconductor/ferromagnet point contact Andreev reflection spectra
K. A. Yates, L. A. B. Olde Olthof, M. E. Vickers, D. Prabhakaran, M. Egilmez, J. W. A. Robinson, L. F. Cohen
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094516 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
As charge carriers traverse a single superconductor ferromagnet interface, they experience an additional spin-dependent phase angle that results in spin mixing and the formation of a bound state called the Andreev bound state. Here we explore whether point contact Andreev reflection can be used to detect the Andreev bound state and, within the limits of our experiment, we extract the resulting spin mixing angle. By examining spectra taken from La1.15Sr1.85Mn2O7−Pb junctions, together with a compilation of literature data on highly spin polarized systems, we suggest that the existence of the Andreev bound state would resolve a number of long standing controversies in the literature of Andreev reflection, as well as defining a route to quantify the strength of spin mixing at superconductor-ferromagnet interfaces. Intriguingly, we find that for high transparency junctions, the spin mixing angle appears to take a relatively narrow range of values across all the samples studied. The ferromagnets we have chosen to study share a common property in terms of their spin arrangement, and our observations may point to the importance of this property in determining the spin mixing angle under these circumstances.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7.2 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Andreev bound states in superconductor/ferromagnet point contact Andreev reflection spectra
similarity 0.99K. A. Yates et al. · 2016 · arXiv:1606.08619
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Origin of spin-polarization decay in point-contact Andreev reflection
similarity 0.96C. H. Kant et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Probing Ferromagnets with Andreev Reflection
similarity 0.95Shashi K. Upadhyay et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Excess conductance in normal-metal/Anderson insulator/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.93A. Vaknin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental verification of contact-size estimates in point-contact spectroscopy on superconductor/ferromagnet heterocontacts
similarity 0.93J. Gramich et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductance spectra of (Nb, Pb, In)/NbP superconductor/Weyl semimetal junctions
similarity 0.93G. Grabecki et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified