Pinning effects on self-heating and flux-flow instability in superconducting films near Tc
Valerij A. Shklovskij, Anastasiia P. Nazipova, Oleksandr V. Dobrovolskiy
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.184517 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The effect of pinning on self-heating triggering the Larkin-Ovchinnikov (LO) flux-flow instability (FFI) in superconducting thin films is theoretically investigated. The problem is considered relying upon the Bezuglyj-Shklovskij (BS) generalization of the LO theory, accounting for a finite heat removal from the quasiparticles at temperature T* to the bath at temperature T0. The FFI critical parameters, namely the current density j*, the electric field E*, the power density P*, and the vortex velocity v* are calculated and graphically analyzed as functions of the magnetic field and the pinning strength. With increasing pinning strength at a fixed magnetic field value E* decreases, j* increases, while P* and T* remain practically constant. Vortex pinning may hence be the cause for eventual discrepancies between experiments on superconductors with strong pinning and the generalized LO and BS results.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| In Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sn Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Coexistence of superconductivity and spin-splitting fields in superconductor/ferromagnetic insulator bilayers of arbitrary thickness
similarity 0.95Alberto Hijano et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase Transition Curves for Mesoscopic Superconducting Samples
similarity 0.94H. T. Jadallah et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Insulator-to-superconductor transition in ultrathin films
similarity 0.94Y. Liu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Experimental limits of the observation of thermally activated phase-slip mechanism in superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.94M. Zgirski & K. Yu. Arutyunov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Localization, superconducting fluctuations, and superconductivity in thin films and narrow wires of aluminum
similarity 0.94P. Santhanam et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Temporary cooling of quasiparticles and delay in voltage response of superconducting bridges after abruptly switching on the supercritical current
similarity 0.94D. Yu. Vodolazov & F. M. Peeters
Source status unknown — claims are unverified