Three superconducting phases with different categories of pairing in hole- and electron-doped LaFeAs1−xPxO
S. Miyasaka, M. Uekubo, H. Tsuji, M. Nakajima, S. Tajima, T. Shiota, H. Mukuda, H. Sagayama, H. Nakao, R. Kumai, Y. Murakami
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214515 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The phase diagram of the LaFeAs1−xPxO system has been extensively studied through hole and electron doping as well as As/P substitution. It has been revealed that there are three different superconducting phases with different Fermi surface (FS) topologies and thus with possibly different pairing glues. One of them is well understood as spin fluctuation-mediated superconductivity within a FS nesting scenario. Another one with the FSs in a bad nesting condition must be explained in a different context such as orbital or spin fluctuation in a strongly correlated electronic system. In both phases, T-linear resistivity was commonly observed when the superconducting transition temperature Tc becomes the highest value, indicating that the strength of bosonic fluctuation determines Tc. In the last superconducting phase, the nesting condition of FSs and the related bosonic fluctuation are moderate. Variety of phase diagram characterizes the multiple orbital nature of the iron-based superconductors which are just near the boundary between weak and strong correlation regimes.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La0.9Sr0.1FeAs1-xPxO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 5 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| La0.9Sr0.1FeAs1-xPxO Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 12 | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| LaFeAs1-xPxO0.86F0.14 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure unresolved | zero_resistance |
| LaFeAs1-xPxO0.75H0.25 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| LaFeAs1-xPxO0.70H0.30 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 35 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
Similar papers
Three superconducting phases with different categories of pairing in hole- and electron-doped LaFeAsPO
similarity 0.94S. Miyasaka et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1706.03954
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Ir-doped LaFe1−xIrxAsO
similarity 0.94Yanpeng Qi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity induced by oxygen deficiency in La0.85Sr0.15FeAsO1−δ
similarity 0.94G. Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Properties of the Fe-Based Layered Superconductor LaFeAsO0.9F0.1−δ
similarity 0.93G. F. Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unusual Nernst effect and spin density wave precursors in superconducting LaFeAsO1−xFx
similarity 0.93Agnieszka Kondrat et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Iron-specific phonon density of states in the superconductors LaFeAsO1−xFx and La1−xCaxFePO
similarity 0.93Satoshi Higashitaniguchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified