Thermodynamics of Meissner effect and flux pinning behavior in the bulk of single-crystal La2−xSrxCuO4 (x=0.09)
I. Dhiman, R. Ziesche, V. K. Anand, L. Riik, Gian Song, A. T. M. N. Islam, Isao Tanaka, W. Treimer
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.104517 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have studied the evolution of magnetic flux pinning behavior in the Meissner phase and the mixed state for the high-Tc single-crystal La2−xSrxCuO4 (x=0.09) superconductor using the polarized neutron imaging method with varying magnetic field and temperature. In the Meissner state expulsion of magnetic field (switched on during the measurements) is visualized, and the signatures of a mixed state with increasing temperature are observed. However, for flux pinning behavior in the range 5K≤T≤15K and Hext=63.5mT (switched off during the measurements), the evolution of the fringe pattern indicates magnetic flux pinning inside the bulk of the sample. At 25K≤T≤32K, a continuous decrease in inhomogeneously distributed pinned magnetic flux is observed, with the sample reaching a normal conducting state at Tc (≈32 K). The flux pinning behavior is also explored as a function of Hext at T=5K. As expected, with increasing Hext an increase in fringe density is observed, indicating an increase in magnetic flux pinning in the bulk of the sample. A comparison between calculated and experimentally visualized pinned magnetic fluxes shows good agreement. This implies quantification of pinned magnetic flux inside the sample, which is not possible with any other technique for bulk samples.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 32.05 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31.65 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La2-xSrxCuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 31.65 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| La2CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBa2Cu3O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Static magnetic correlations near the insulating-superconducting phase boundary in La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.94M. Fujita et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Charge density wave fluctuations in La2−xSrxCuO4 and their competition with superconductivity
similarity 0.94T. P. Croft et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Muon spin relaxation and magnetic susceptibility studies of the effects of nonmagnetic impurities on the Cu spin dynamics and superconductivity in La2−xSrxCu1−yZnyO4 around x=0.115
similarity 0.94T. Adachi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Unconventional lattice stiffening in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4 single crystals
similarity 0.94Minoru Nohara et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex fluctuations in superconducting La2−xSrxCuO4+δ
similarity 0.94Yung M. Huh & D. K. Finnemore
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pervasive symmetry-lowering nanoscale structural fluctuations in the cuprate La2−xSrxCuO4
similarity 0.94R. J. Spieker et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified