Amplification of Cooper pair splitting current in a graphene-based Cooper pair beam splitter geometry
SK Firoz Islam, Arijit Saha
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.125406 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Motivated by the recent experiments [Scientific Reports 6, 23051 (2016); Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 096602 (2015)], we theoretically investigate Cooper pair splitting current in a graphene-based Cooper pair beam splitter geometry. By considering the graphene-based superconductor as an entangler device, instead of normal [two-dimensional (2D)] BCS superconductor, we show that the Cooper pair splitting current mediated by the crossed Andreev process is amplified compared to its normal superconductor counterpart. This amplification is attributed to the strong suppression of the local normal Andreev reflection process (arising from the Cooper pair splitting) from the graphene-based superconductor to lead via the same quantum dot, in comparison to the usual 2D superconductor. Due to the vanishing density of states at the Dirac point of undoped graphene, a doped graphene-based superconductor is considered here and it is observed that Cooper pair splitting current is very insensitive to the doping level in comparison to the usual 2D superconductor. The transport process of nonlocal spin-entangled electrons also depends on the type of pairing, i.e., whether the electron-hole pairing is onsite, intersublattice or the combination of both. The intersublattice pairing of graphene causes the maximum nonlocal Cooper pair splitting current, whereas the presence of both pairings reduces the Cooper pair splitting current.
Similar papers
A Ballistic Graphene Cooper Pair Splitter
similarity 0.91P. Pandey et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2005.09580
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable nonlocal valley-entangled Cooper pair splitter realized in bilayer-graphene van der Waals spin valves
similarity 0.89Xiuqiang Wu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Prominent Cooper pairing away from the Fermi level and its spectroscopic signature in twisted bilayer graphene
similarity 0.89Fabian Schrodi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson current in graphene: Role of unconventional pairing symmetries
similarity 0.89Jacob Linder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev conductance in the d+id′-wave superconducting states of graphene
similarity 0.88Yongjin Jiang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal quantum state engineering with the Cooper pair splitter beyond the Coulomb blockade regime
similarity 0.88Ehud Amitai et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified