← Back to search

Unexpected effects of thickness and strain on superconductivity and magnetism in optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 thin films

L. Howald, E. Stilp, F. Baiutti, C. Dietl, F. Wrobel, G. Logvenov, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, N. Wooding, D. Pavuna, H. Keller, A. Suter

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.094514 · Physical Review B

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The magnetic field distribution of the vortex lattice of optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 thin films of various thicknesses, grown on different substrates, was investigated. The influence of film thickness and biaxial strain on the magnetic penetration depth and the superconducting number density were studied using muon spin rotation and compared to single-crystal results. We found an effective superconducting layer thickness smaller than the total film thickness, implying that the interfaces of the films are not or less superconducting than the bulk of the film. The superfluid density diminished in thinner films whereas compressive strain enhanced it. This shows that the number density of superconducting carriers is strongly affected by the boundary conditions as well as by the strain. Furthermore, in fully relaxed optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 films grown on SrTiO3, we found a low-temperature magnetic state which sets in at Tc. It is reasoned that defects at the surface slow down high-frequency magnetic fluctuations such that a “quasistatic” magnetic ground state results, which coexists with the diminished surface superconductivity. These results indicate that the properties of the surface of optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 superconductors differ substantially from the bulk.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
La1.84Sr0.16CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La1.83Sr0.17CuO4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
La2-xSrxCuO4+ε

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers