Unexpected effects of thickness and strain on superconductivity and magnetism in optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 thin films
L. Howald, E. Stilp, F. Baiutti, C. Dietl, F. Wrobel, G. Logvenov, T. Prokscha, Z. Salman, N. Wooding, D. Pavuna, H. Keller, A. Suter
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.094514 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The magnetic field distribution of the vortex lattice of optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 thin films of various thicknesses, grown on different substrates, was investigated. The influence of film thickness and biaxial strain on the magnetic penetration depth and the superconducting number density were studied using muon spin rotation and compared to single-crystal results. We found an effective superconducting layer thickness smaller than the total film thickness, implying that the interfaces of the films are not or less superconducting than the bulk of the film. The superfluid density diminished in thinner films whereas compressive strain enhanced it. This shows that the number density of superconducting carriers is strongly affected by the boundary conditions as well as by the strain. Furthermore, in fully relaxed optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 films grown on SrTiO3, we found a low-temperature magnetic state which sets in at Tc. It is reasoned that defects at the surface slow down high-frequency magnetic fluctuations such that a “quasistatic” magnetic ground state results, which coexists with the diminished surface superconductivity. These results indicate that the properties of the surface of optimally doped La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 superconductors differ substantially from the bulk.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| La1.84Sr0.16CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La1.83Sr0.17CuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La2-xSrxCuO4+ε Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Magnetic flux rotation anomalies in superconducting La1.85Sr0.15CuO4
similarity 0.95Y. Bruckental et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum Phase Transition in the Magnetic-Field-Induced Normal State of Optimum-Doped High-Tc Cuprate Superconductors at Low Temperatures
similarity 0.95F. F. Balakirev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature of electron-doped La2−xCexCuO4 and Pr2−xCexCuO4 cuprate heterostructures
similarity 0.94K. Jin et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Extended x-ray-absorption fine-structure study of La2−xSrxCuO4−y superconductors
similarity 0.94J. M. Tranquada et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Appearance of a maximum in the superconducting transition temperature of a Bi2.2Sr1.8CaCu2O8+y single crystal under pressure
similarity 0.94Tongkai Huang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Density of states modulations from oxygen phonons in d-wave superconductors: Reconciling angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy and scanning tunneling microscopy
similarity 0.94S. Johnston & T. P. Devereaux
Source status unknown — claims are unverified