Metallization of a Rashba wire by a superconducting layer in the strong-proximity regime
Christopher Reeg, Daniel Loss, Jelena Klinovaja
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.165425 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Semiconducting quantum wires defined within two-dimensional electron gases and strongly coupled to thin superconducting layers have been extensively explored in recent experiments as promising platforms to host Majorana bound states. We study numerically such a geometry, consisting of a quasi-one-dimensional wire coupled to a disordered three-dimensional superconducting layer. We find that, in the strong-coupling limit of a sizable proximity-induced superconducting gap, all transverse subbands of the wire are significantly shifted in energy relative to the chemical potential of the wire. For the lowest subband, this band shift is comparable in magnitude to the spacing between quantized levels that arises due to the finite thickness of the superconductor (which typically is ∼500 meV for a 10-nm-thick layer of aluminum); in higher subbands, the band shift is much larger. Additionally, we show that the width of the system, which is usually much larger than the thickness, and moderate disorder within the superconductor have almost no impact on the induced gap or band shift. We provide a detailed discussion of the ramifications of our results, arguing that a huge band shift and significant renormalization of semiconducting material parameters in the strong-coupling limit make it challenging to realize a topological phase in such a setup, as the strong coupling to the superconductor essentially metallizes the semiconductor. This metallization of the semiconductor can be tested experimentally through the measurement of the band shift.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InAs Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| InSb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Interplay of hyperbolic plasmons and superconductivity
similarity 0.92Andrey Grankin & Victor Galitski
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Proximity effect of a ferromagnetic insulator in contact with a superconductor
similarity 0.92T. Tokuyasu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Microscopic mechanism of electric-field-induced superconductivity suppression in metallic thin films
similarity 0.92Alessio Zaccone et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallization of Rashba wire by superconducting layer in the strong-proximity regime
similarity 0.92Christopher Reeg et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1801.06509
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Metallization and proximity superconductivity in topological insulator nanowires
similarity 0.92Henry F. Legg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tailoring Superconductivity with Two-Level Systems
similarity 0.91Joshuah T. Heath et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified