Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects for local and nonlocal Cooper pairs
Damian Tomaszewski, Piotr Busz, Rosa López, Rok Žitko, Minchul Lee, Jan Martinek
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.214506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study combined interference effects due to the Aharonov-Bohm (AB) and Aharonov-Casher (AC) phases in a Josephson supercurrent of local and nonlocal (split) Cooper pairs. We analyze a junction between two superconductors interconnected through a normal-state nanostructure with either (i) a ring, where single-electron interference is possible, or (ii) two parallel nanowires, where the single-electron interference can be absent, but the cross Andreev reflection can occur. In the low-transmission regime in both geometries the AB and AC effects can be related to only local or nonlocal Cooper pair transport, respectively.
Similar papers
Aharonov-Bohm and Aharonov-Casher effects in a double quantum dot Josephson junction
similarity 0.95Damian Tomaszewski et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nonlocal transport and heating in superconductors under dual-bias conditions
similarity 0.89S. Kolenda et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson current through a superconductor/semiconductor-nanowire/superconductor junction: Effects of strong spin-orbit coupling and Zeeman splitting
similarity 0.89Meng Cheng & Roman M. Lutchyn
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in interacting double-dot systems
similarity 0.89James Eldridge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson current and Andreev states in superconductor–half metal–superconductor heterostructures
similarity 0.89Artem V. Galaktionov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection versus Coulomb blockade in hybrid semiconductor nanowire devices
similarity 0.88Yong-Joo Doh et al. · 2008 · arXiv:0805.3557
Source status unknown — claims are unverified