Unusual evolution from a superconducting to an antiferromagnetic ground state in Y1−xGdxPb3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1)
M. Cabrera-Baez, V. C. Denis, L. Mendonça-Ferreira, M. Carlone, P. A. Venegas, M. A. Avila, C. Rettori
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.224425 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We have studied the evolution of Y1−xGdxPb3 (0≤x≤1) from its superconducting (x=0) to antiferromagnetic (x=1) states with critical temperatures Tc=4.6(2)K and TN=15.7(2)K, respectively. At relatively low Gd concentrations (x≤0.03) Tc presents a weak but linear suppression with increasing x, as expected from the Abrikosov-Gorkov (AG) theory describing the Cooper pair breaking due to the exchange interaction between the impurity localized magnetic moment and the conduction electrons (ce). This linear Tc suppression rate leads to an effective exchange parameter of 〈J2(q)〉AG1/2=0.20(7)meV between the 4f localized electrons and the ce. For intermediate Gd concentrations (0.03≤x≤0.15), although no Gd clustering is observed, there is an unusual inflection and leveling off trend in Tc, indicating that the superconducting phase persists until the highest Gd concentration in this region where magnetic interactions are evidenced by increasingly negative values of the Curie-Weiss temperature ΘC. Analysis of low-TGd3+ electron spin resonance (ESR) experiments and their ESR line-shape simulations, in conjunction with the trend in Tc, leads us to suggest that an exchange bottleneck mechanism between the Gd+3 localized magnetic moment and the ce may be the reason behind the inhibition of the Cooper pair-breaking mechanism, in favor of a magnetic interaction via ce polarization. Therefore, our superconducting and ESR results suggest a scenario where superconducting and magnetic phases coexist extensively in the Y1−xGdxPb3 system, mediated by different types of ce.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| YPb3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 4.6 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaSn3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 6.25 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YSn3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 7 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric YPtBi under pressure
similarity 0.92T. V. Bay et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting state in the ternary stannide superconductors R3T4Sn13 (R = La, Sr; T = Rh, Ir) with a quasiskutterudite structure
similarity 0.91N. Kase et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and magnetism in the Heusler alloys MPd2Pb (M=rare earth, Th, and U)
similarity 0.91C. L. Seaman et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of magnetism and superconductivity in ultraclean underdoped YBa2Cu3O6.37
similarity 0.91R. I. Miller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in an anomalously tetragonal YBa2Cu3O6.62 single crystal: A possible singularity in the structural phase diagram
similarity 0.91T. Frello et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Signatures of three-dimensional photoinduced superconductivity in YBa2Cu3O6.48
similarity 0.91M. Rosenberg et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified