Phase separation at the dimer-superconductor transition in Ir1−xRhxTe2
R. Yu, S. Banerjee, H. Lei, M. Abeykoon, C. Petrovic, Z. Guguchia, E. S. Bozin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.134506 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The detailed evolution of the local atomic structure across the (x, T) phase diagram of transition metal dichalcogenide superconductor Ir1−xRhxTe2 (0≤x≤0.3, 10K≤T≤300K) is obtained from high-quality x-ray diffraction data using the atomic pair distribution function (PDF) method. The observed hysteretic thermal structural phase transition from a trigonal (P3¯m1) to a triclinic (P1¯) dimer phase for low Rh content emphasizes the intimate connection between the lattice and electronic properties. For superconducting samples away from the dimer/superconductor phase boundary, structural transition is absent and the local structure remains trigonal down to 10 K. In the narrow range of compositions close to the boundary, PDF analysis reveals structural phase separation, suggestive of weak first-order character of the Rh-doping induced dimer-superconductor quantum phase transition. Samples from this narrow range show weak anomalies in electronic transport and magnetization, hallmarks of the dimer phase, as well as superconductivity albeit with incomplete diamagnetic screening. The results suggest that the dimer and superconducting orders exist in the mutually exclusive spatial regions.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ir1-xRhxTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| IrTe2:Pd Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ir1-xPtxTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| CuxIrTe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 3 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| Ir0.95Pt0.05Te2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Ir0.8Rh0.2Te2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Enhanced stability and superconductivity of IrTe2/In2Se3 heterobilayers with ferroelectrically switchable band topology
similarity 0.94Jianyong Chen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Evidence of unconventional pairing in the quasi-two-dimensional CuIr2−xRuxTe4 superconductor
similarity 0.94T. Shang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Relation between the structural phase transition and superconductivity in CuxIrTe2−ySey
similarity 0.94M. Kamitani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of local fluctuating dimers in superconducting Ir1−x(Pt,Rh)xTe2
similarity 0.93Runze Yu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity in Defective Pyrite-Type Iridium Chalcogenides IrxCh2 (Ch=Se and Te)
similarity 0.93Yanpeng Qi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Orbital degeneracy and Peierls instability in the triangular-lattice superconductor Ir1−xPtxTe2
similarity 0.92Daiki Ootsuki et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified