Nanobridge superconducting quantum interference devices: Beyond the Josephson limit
Dibyendu Hazra
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.144505 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Nanoscale superconducting quantum interference devices (nano-SQUIDS) where the weak links are made from nanobridges, i.e., nanobridge SQUIDs (NBSs), are one of the most sensitive magnetometers for nanoscale magnetometry. Because of very strong nonlinearity in the nanobridge-electrode joints, the applied magnetic flux (Φa)–critical current (Ic) characteristics of NBSs differ very significantly from conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, especially when the nanobridges are long and/or the screening parameter is large. However, in most of the theoretical descriptions, NBSs have been treated as the conventional tunnel-junction SQUIDs, which are based on the dc Josephson effect. Here, I present a model demonstrating that for long nanobridges and/or large screening parameters the Ic(Φa) of a NBS can be explained by merely considering the fluxoid quantization in the NBS loop and the energy of the NBS; it is not necessary to take the Josephson effect into consideration. I also demonstrate that using the model, one can derive useful expressions such as the modulation depth and transfer function. I discuss the role of the kinetic inductance fraction (κ) in determining Ic(Φa). I compare the predictions of the present model with the experimental data already published by several groups.
Similar papers
Josephson Junctions with Artificial Superparamagnetic Barrier: A Promising Avenue for Nanoscale Magnetometry
similarity 0.91Ivan P. Nevirkovets et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetically induced Josephson nano-diodes in field-resilient superconducting microwave circuits
similarity 0.88Benedikt Wilde et al. · 2025 · arXiv:2511.16727
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Critical current noise investigations in underdamped Josephson devices
similarity 0.88C. Granata et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum interference in a superconductor--superconductor Josephson junction
similarity 0.88Yu-Hang Li & Ran Cheng · 2022 · arXiv:2206.13484
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Advanced superconducting circuits and devices
similarity 0.88Martin Weides & Hannes Rotzinger · 2014 · arXiv:1402.6857
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nb nano superconducting quantum interference devices with high spin sensitivity for operation in magnetic fields up to 0.5\,T
similarity 0.88Roman Wölbing et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1304.7584
Source status unknown — claims are unverified