Supercurrent in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions with heavy-metal interlayers. II. Canted magnetization
Nathan Satchell, Reza Loloee, Norman O. Birge
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.174519 · Physical Review B
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
It has been suggested by theoretical works that equal-spin triplet pair correlations can be generated in Josephson junctions containing both a ferromagnet and a source of spin-orbit coupling. Our recent experimental work suggested that such triplet correlations were not generated by a Pt spin-orbit coupling layer when the ferromagnetic weak link had entirely in-plane anisotropy [Satchell and Birge, Phys. Rev. B 97, 214509 (2018)]. Here, we revisit the experiment using Pt again as a source for spin-orbit coupling and a [Co(0.4nm)/Ni(0.4nm)]×8/Co(0.4nm) ferromagnetic weak link with both in-plane and out-of-plane magnetization components (canted magnetization). The canted magnetization more closely matches theoretical predictions than our previous experimental work. Our results suggest that there is no supercurrent contribution in our junctions from equal-spin triplet pair correlations. In addition, this work includes systematic study of supercurrent dependence on Cu interlayer thickness, a common additional layer used to buffer the growth of the ferromagnet and which for Co may significantly improve the growth morphology. We report that the supercurrent in the [Co(0.4nm)/Ni(0.4nm)]×8/Co(0.4nm) ferromagnetic weak links can be enhanced by over two orders of magnitude by tuning the Cu interlayer thickness. This result has important application in superconducting spintronics, where large critical currents are desirable for devices.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Supercurrent in ferromagnetic Josephson junctions with heavy metal interlayers
similarity 0.96Nathan Satchell & Norman O. Birge
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced Supercurrents in Josephson Junctions Containing Nonparallel Ferromagnetic Domains
similarity 0.95J. W. A. Robinson et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anisotropic supercurrent suppression and revivals in a graphene-based Josephson junction under in-plane magnetic fields
similarity 0.95Philipp Schmidt et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reentrant superconductivity in superconductor/ferromagnetic-alloy bilayers
similarity 0.94V. I. Zdravkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamical gate-tunable supercurrents in topological Josephson junctions
similarity 0.93C. Kurter et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Vortex-induced negative magnetoresistance and peak effect in narrow superconducting films
similarity 0.93D. Y. Vodolazov
Source status unknown — claims are unverified