Numerical simulation of bosonic-superconducting-string interactions
Pablo Laguna, Richard A. Matzner
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.41.1751 · Physical Review D
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Numerical simulations show that bosonic superconducting U(1) gauge cosmic strings interact by reconnecting and chopping off in a fashion similar to nonconducting strings. Cancellation of the electromagnetic current occurs when, in one of the strings, the direction of the U(1) gauge magnetic field is opposite to the electromagnetic current flow. Electric charge accumulates on the segments of the reconnected strings where the current is discontinuous or vanishes. A virtual photon appears after the collision and intercommutation, and a bubble of electromagnetic radiation emerges as the currents in the reconnected strings equalize. These phenomena suggest new possible mechanisms for void production in the large-scale distribution of galaxies.
Similar papers
Delocalization in Two-Dimensional Disordered Bose Systems and Depinning Transition in the Vortex State in Superconductors
similarity 0.84A. V. Lopatin & V. M. Vinokur
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Computer simulations of dynamics of flux lines in type-II superconductors
similarity 0.84Ryuzo Kato et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of a gravitomagnetic field on pure superconductors
similarity 0.83N. Li & D. G. Torr
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Statistical mechanics of vortices from field theory
similarity 0.83K. Kajantie et al. · 1999 · arXiv:hep-lat/9906028
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Search for a vortex loop blowout transition in a type-II superconductor in a finite magnetic field
similarity 0.82P. Olsson & S. Teitel
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Bosons in fluctuating gauge fields: Bose metal and phase separation
similarity 0.82Robert L. Jack & Derek K. K. Lee · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0203274
Source status unknown — claims are unverified