Baryon-number violation at the Superconducting Super Collider? Recent claims reexamined
Peter B. Arnold, Michael P. Mattis
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.42.1738 · Physical Review D
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recent instanton calculations suggest that baryon-number violation is unsuppressed at energies near 10 TeV. We show how to diagrammatically analyze corrections to the basic approximations. We find additional multiplicative contributions of exp(±constαW) to the cross section at such energies which may keep the rate from becoming large. In addition, the pi·pj structure of these corrections is problematic for recent techniques suggested for improving the instanton calculation and controlling corrections at high energy. Despite these corrections, the initial exponential growth of the cross section first obtained by Ringwald survives.
Similar papers
Baryon number violation and nonperturbative weak processes at Superconducting Super Collider energies
similarity 0.91E. V. Shuryak & J. J. M. Verbaarschot
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supersymmetric-charged-Higgs-boson production at the Superconducting Super Collider
similarity 0.86O. J. P. Éboli et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of quark compositeness at the Superconducting Super Collider
similarity 0.84Itzhak Bars & Ian Hinchliffe
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single W- and Z-boson production as a probe for rapidity gaps at the Superconducting Super Collider
similarity 0.84H. Chehime & D. Zeppenfeld
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Semihard QCD expectations for proton-(anti)proton scattering at CERN, Fermilab Tevatron, and the Superconducting Super Collider
similarity 0.83J. Kwiecinski & A. D. Martin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Production rates for Higgs boson plus multiple jets at the Superconducting Super Collider
similarity 0.83S. Dawson & R. P. Kauffman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified