Cosmological constraints on superconducting dark energy models
Zoltán Keresztes, László Á. Gergely, Tiberiu Harko, Shi-Dong Liang
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevD.92.123503 · Physical Review D
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider cosmological tests of a scalar-vector-tensor gravitational model, in which the dark energy is included in the total action through a gauge-invariant, electromagnetic type contribution. The ground state of dark energy, corresponding to a constant potential V, is a Bose-Einstein type condensate with spontaneously broken U(1) symmetry. In other words, dark energy appears as a massive vector field emerging from a superposition of a massless vector and a scalar field, the latter corresponding to the Goldstone boson. Two particular cosmological models, corresponding to pure electric and pure magnetic type potentials, respectively, are confronted with type IA supernovae and Hubble parameter data. In the electric case, a good fit is obtained along a narrow inclined stripe in the Ωm−ΩV parameter plane, which includes the Λ cold dark matter limit as the best fit. The other points on this admissible region represent superconducting dark energy as a sum of a cosmological constant and a time-evolving contribution. In the magnetic case the cosmological test selects either (i) parameter ranges of the superconducting dark energy allowing for the standard baryonic sector plus dark matter or (ii) a unified superconducting dark matter and dark energy model, additionally including only the baryonic sector.
Similar papers
Superconducting dark energy
similarity 0.94Shi-Dong Liang & Tiberiu Harko
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Excited cosmic strings with superconducting currents
similarity 0.86Betti Hartmann et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comments on dynamical mass versus superconducting gap generation
similarity 0.85L. V. Belvedere
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Analytic investigation of holographic phase transitions influenced by dark matter sector
similarity 0.84Lukasz Nakonieczny et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1509.01769
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductors and gravity
similarity 0.84Antonio Gallerati & Giovanni Ummarino · 2022 · arXiv:2203.09417
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Short-distance breakdown of the Higgs mechanism and the robustness of the BCS theory for charged superconductors
similarity 0.84Sonja Fischer et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified