Role of aperiodic order for fluxon dynamics in Josephson junction arrays
Erik Lennholm, Michael Hörnquist
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.381 · Physical Review E
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We perform numerical simulations of a kink-shaped soliton, a fluxon, propagating in arrays of Josephson junctions ordered according to the period-doubling sequence, the Fibonacci sequence, the paper-folding sequence, the Rudin-Shapiro sequence, and the Thue-Morse sequence. The equation of motion is the discrete sine-Gordon equation with additional terms describing dissipation and an injected bias current. With the use of an effective potential we explain the behavior of the fluxon when it gets pinned in different arrays. The potential also gives a qualitative understanding of the deviation of the velocity of a propagating fluxon compared with an earlier obtained formula. It turns out that the self-similarity of the underlying sequences is important for the detailed dynamics, but not for the speed of a propagating fluxon. Finally, we show how this effective potential can be used to arrange an array to have some desired properties.
Similar papers
Dynamics of row-switched states in Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.87J. R. Phillips et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Influence of induced magnetic fields on Shapiro steps in Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.84J. R. Phillips et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
High-field vortices in Josephson junctions with alternating critical current density
similarity 0.84Maayan Moshe & R. G. Mints
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Full capacitance-matrix effects in driven Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.84Frank Gibbons et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single-vortex-induced voltage steps in Josephson-junction arrays
similarity 0.83P. H. E. Tiesinga et al. · 1996 · arXiv:cond-mat/9612230
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Absence of fractional ac Josephson effect in superconducting junctions
similarity 0.83Mikhail S. Kalenkov & Andrei D. Zaikin
Source status unknown — claims are unverified