Nonequilibrium work by charge control in a Josephson junction
Su Do Yi, Beom Jun Kim, Juyeon Yi
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.88.022143 · Physical Review E
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We consider a single Josephson junction in the presence of time varying gate charge, and examine the nonequilibrium work done by the charge control in the framework of fluctuation theorems. Assuming first a high quality junction with negligible Ohmic current, we obtain the probability distribution functions of the work and confirm the Crooks relation to give the estimation of the free energy changes ΔF=0. The reliability of ΔF estimated from the Jarzynksi equality is crucially dependent on protocol parameters, while the Bennett's acceptance ratio method yields consistently ΔF=0. We examine the behaviors of the work average and point out its relation to heat and entropy production associated with the circuit control. Finally considering finite tunnel resistance we discuss dissipation effects on the work statistics.
Similar papers
Nonideal quantum measurement effects on the switching-current distribution of Josephson junctions
similarity 0.87Vincenzo Pierro & Giovanni Filatrella
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Heat transport through a Josephson junction
similarity 0.86Dmitry Golubev et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quantum effective action for the bosonic Josephson junction
similarity 0.85K. Furutani et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Tunable φ Josephson junction ratchet
similarity 0.85R. Menditto et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Autonomous stochastic resonance in fully frustrated Josephson-junction ladders
similarity 0.85Gun Sang Jeon & M. Y. Choi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Current distributions of thermal switching in extremely underdamped Josephson junctions
similarity 0.84Paolo Silvestrini et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified