← Back to search

Conserved nonlocal dynamics and critical behavior of uranium ferromagnetic superconductors

Rohit Singh, Kishore Dutta, Malay K. Nandy

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.95.012133 · Physical Review E

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

A recent theoretical study [Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 037202 (2014)] has revealed that systems such as uranium ferromagnetic superconductors obey conserved dynamics. To capture the critical behavior near the paramagnetic to ferromagnetic phase transition of these compounds, we study the conserved critical dynamics of a nonlocal Ginzburg-Landau model. A dynamic renormalization-group calculation at one-loop order yields the critical indices in the leading order of ε=dc−d, where dc=4−2ρ is the upper critical dimension, with ρ an exponent in the nonlocal interaction. The predicted static critical exponents are found to be comparable with the available experimentally observed critical exponents for strongly uniaxial uranium ferromagnetic superconductors. The corresponding dynamic exponent z and linewidth exponent w are found to be z=4−ρε/4+O(ε2) and w=1+ρ+3ε/4+O(ε2).

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
URhGe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.27Pressure unresolvedunknown
UGe2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
UIr

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
UCoGe

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.6Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers