Cross Correlation of Incoherent Multiple Andreev Reflections
Sylvie Duhot, François Lefloch, Manuel Houzet
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.086804 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We use a semiclassical theory to calculate the current correlations in a multiterminal structure composed of a normal metallic dot connected to all superconducting leads at arbitrary voltage and temperature. This theory holds when the proximity effect is suppressed in the dot. At low voltage, eV≪Δ (Δ is the superconducting gap in the leads), when charge transport is due to incoherent multiple Andreev reflections, the correlations are strongly enhanced compared to those in the normal state. Moreover, we predict that the cross correlation can be positive or negative depending on the properties of the point contacts between the dot and the leads. We also discuss the effect of inelastic scattering in the dot.
Similar papers
Geometry-specific conductance fluctuations in semiconductor-superconductor microjunctions
similarity 0.91Y. Takagaki & K. H. Ploog
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multipair dc Josephson resonances in a biased all-superconducting bijunction
similarity 0.90T. Jonckheere et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dephasing-enabled triplet Andreev conductance
similarity 0.89B. Béri
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase dependent multiple Andreev reflections in SNS interferometers
similarity 0.89J. Lantz et al. · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0201278
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Multiple Andreev and elastic interface scattering in superconductor-normal-metal-superconductor junctions
similarity 0.88A. Golub & B. Horovitz
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cross-correlations of coherent multiple Andreev reflections
similarity 0.88Roman-Pascal Riwar et al. · 2015 · arXiv:1511.00299
Source status unknown — claims are unverified