Strong Coupling Superconductivity, Pseudogap, and Mott Transition
G. Sordi, P. Sémon, K. Haule, A.-M. S. Tremblay
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.216401 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
An intricate interplay between superconductivity, pseudogap, and Mott transition, either bandwidth driven or doping driven, occurs in materials. Layered organic conductors and cuprates offer two prime examples. We provide a unified perspective of this interplay in the two-dimensional Hubbard model within cellular dynamical mean-field theory on a 2×2 plaquette and using the continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method as impurity solver. Both at half filling and at finite doping, the metallic normal state close to the Mott insulator is unstable to d-wave superconductivity. Superconductivity can destroy the first-order transition that separates the pseudogap phase from the overdoped metal, yet that normal state transition leaves its marks on the dynamic properties of the superconducting phase. For example, as a function of doping one finds a rapid change in the particle-hole asymmetry of the superconducting density of states. In the doped Mott insulator, the dynamical mean-field superconducting transition temperature Tcd does not scale with the order parameter when there is a normal-state pseudogap. Tcd corresponds to the local pair formation temperature observed in tunneling experiments and is distinct from the pseudogap temperature.
Similar papers
Strong coupling superconductivity, pseudogap and Mott transition
similarity 0.93G. Sordi et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1201.1283
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap transition within the superconducting phase in the three-band Hubbard model
similarity 0.93S. S. Dash & D. Sénéchal
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effect of pseudogap formation on the superconducting gap in underdoped cuprates
similarity 0.92E. Schachinger & J. P. Carbotte
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Strongly correlated superconductivity
similarity 0.92A. -M. S. Tremblay · 2013 · arXiv:1310.1481
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity and the Pseudogap in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model
similarity 0.91Emanuel Gull et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Pseudogap and singlet formation in organic and cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.91J. Merino & O. Gunnarsson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified