Andreev Current Induced by Ferromagnetic Resonance
Caroline Richard, Manuel Houzet, Julia S. Meyer
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.057002 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We study charge transport through a metallic dot coupled to a superconducting and a ferromagnetic lead with a precessing magnetization due to ferromagnetic resonance. Using the quasiclassical theory, we find that the magnetization precession induces a dc current in the subgap regime even in the absence of a bias voltage. This effect is due to the rectification of the ac spin currents at the interface with the ferromagnet; it exists in the absence of spin current in the superconductor. When the dot is strongly coupled to the superconductor, we find a strong enhancement in a wide range of parameters as compared to the induced current in the normal state.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Andreev current induced by ferromagnetic resonance
similarity 0.96Caroline Richard et al. · 2012 · arXiv:1204.1491
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin accumulation and Andreev reflection in a mesoscopic ferromagnetic wire
similarity 0.94W. Belzig et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Flux-Modulated Andreev Current Caused by Electronic Interference
similarity 0.94H. Pothier et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Conductance quantization and Andreev reflection in narrow ferromagnet/superconductor point contacts
similarity 0.93K. Kikuchi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Andreev reflection through Fano resonances in molecular wires
similarity 0.93A. Kormányos et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Supercurrent Spectroscopy of Andreev States
similarity 0.93L. Bretheau et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified