← Back to search

From Ising Resonant Fluctuations to Static Uniaxial Order in Antiferromagnetic and Weakly Superconducting CeCo(In1−xHgx)5(x=0.01)

C. Stock, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, K. Schmalzl, F. Demmel, D. K. Singh, F. Ronning, J. D. Thompson, E. D. Bauer

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.037003 · Physical Review Letters

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

CeCo(In0.990Hg0.010)5 is a charge doped variant of the d-wave CoCoIn5 superconductor with coexistent antiferromagnetic and superconducting transitions occurring at TN=3.4 and Tc=1.4 K, respectively. We use neutron diffraction and spectroscopy to show that the magnetic resonant fluctuations present in the parent superconducting phase are replaced by collinear c-axis magnetic order with three-dimensional Ising critical fluctuations. No low-energy transverse spin fluctuations are observable in this doping-induced antiferromagnetic phase and the dynamic resonant spectral weight predominately shifts to the elastic channel. Static (τ>0.2 ns) collinear Ising order is proximate to superconductivity in CeCoIn5 and is stabilized through hole doping with Hg.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
CeCo(In0.990Hg0.010)5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.4Pressure not reportedunknown
CeCo(In0.987Hg0.013)5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

1.4Pressure not reportedunknown
CeCoIn5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

2.3Pressure not reportedunknown
CeIrIn5

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

0.4Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers