Local and Nonlocal Two-Electron Tunneling Processes in a Cooper Pair Splitter
Antti Ranni, Elsa T. Mannila, Axel Eriksson, Dmitry S. Golubev, Jukka P. Pekola, Ville F. Maisi
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.207703 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We measure the rates and coupling coefficients for local Andreev, nonlocal Andreev, and elastic cotunneling processes. The nonlocal Andreev process, giving rise to Cooper pair splitting, exhibits the same coupling coefficient as the elastic cotunneling whereas the local Andreev process is more than 2 orders of magnitude stronger than the corresponding nonlocal one. Theory estimates describe the findings and explain the large difference in the nonlocal and local coupling arising from competition between electron diffusion in the superconductor and tunnel junction transparency.
Similar papers
Local and non-local two-electron tunneling processes in a Cooper pair splitter
similarity 0.92Antti Ranni et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2201.13109
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Local electrical tuning of the nonlocal signals in a Cooper pair splitter
similarity 0.91G. Fülöp et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Entangled electron current through finite size normal-superconductor tunneling structures
similarity 0.90E. Prada & F. Sols · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0307500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of collective modes on pair tunneling into superconductors
similarity 0.90Yong Baek Kim & Xiao-Gang Wen
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Circuit influence on Cooper-pair current in solid-state entanglers
similarity 0.89Vladimir Bubanja & Shuichi Iwabuchi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting proximity effect in interacting double-dot systems
similarity 0.89James Eldridge et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified