Why Shot Noise Does Not Generally Detect Pairing in Mesoscopic Superconducting Tunnel Junctions
Jiasen Niu, Koen M. Bastiaans, Jian-Feng Ge, Ruchi Tomar, John Jesudasan, Pratap Raychaudhuri, Max Karrer, Reinhold Kleiner, Dieter Koelle, Arnaud Barbier, Eduard F. C. Driessen, Yaroslav M. Blanter, Milan P. Allan
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.076001 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The shot noise in tunneling experiments reflects the Poissonian nature of the tunneling process. The shot-noise power is proportional to both the magnitude of the current and the effective charge of the carrier. Shot-noise spectroscopy thus enables us, in principle, to determine the effective charge q of the charge carriers of that tunnel. This can be used to detect electron pairing in superconductors: In the normal state, the noise corresponds to single electron tunneling (q=1e), while in the paired state, the noise corresponds to q=2e. Here, we use a newly developed amplifier to reveal that in typical mesoscopic superconducting junctions, the shot noise does not reflect the signatures of pairing and instead stays at a level corresponding to q=1e. We show that transparency can control the shot noise, and this q=1e is due to the large number of tunneling channels with each having very low transparency. Our results indicate that in typical mesoscopic superconducting junctions, one should expect q=1e noise and lead to design guidelines for junctions that allow the detection of electron pairing.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 8 | Pressure not reported | zero_resistance |
| NbN Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Shot noise of large charge quanta in superconductor/semiconductor/superconductor junctions
similarity 0.94F. E. Camino et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhanced shot noise at bilayer graphene–superconductor junction
similarity 0.93Manas Ranjan Sahu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent Multiple Charge Transfer in a Superconducting NbN Tunnel Junction
similarity 0.93Y. Uzawa & Z. Wang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Energy-Gap Dynamics of Superconducting NbN Thin Films Studied by Time-Resolved Terahertz Spectroscopy
similarity 0.92M. Beck et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Shot-noise and conductance measurements of transparent superconductor/two-dimensional electron gas junctions
similarity 0.92B.-R. Choi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Physical mechanisms of timing jitter in photon detection by current-carrying superconducting nanowires
similarity 0.92Mariia Sidorova et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified