Capping Effects on Spin and Charge Excitations in Parent and Superconducting Nd1−xSrxNiO2
S. Fan, H. LaBollita, Q. Gao, N. Khan, Y. Gu, T. Kim, J. Li, V. Bhartiya, Y. Li, W. Sun, J. Yang, S. Yan, A. Barbour, X. Zhou, A. Cano, F. Bernardini, Y. Nie, Z. Zhu, V. Bisogni, C. Mazzoli, A. S. Botana, J. Pelliciari
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.206501 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity in infinite layer nickelates Nd1−xSrxNiO2 has so far been achieved only in thin films, raising questions on the role of substrates and interfaces. Given the challenges associated with their synthesis it is imperative to identify their intrinsic properties. We use resonant inelastic x-ray scattering to investigate the influence of the SrTiO3 capping layer on the excitations of Nd1−xSrxNiO2 (x=0 and 0.2). Spin excitations are observed in parent and 20% doped Nd1−xSrxNiO2 regardless of capping, proving that magnetism is intrinsic to infinite-layer nickelates and appears in a significant fraction of their phase diagram. In parent and superconducting Nd1−xSrxNiO2, the spin excitations are slightly hardened in capped samples compared to the noncapped ones. Additionally, a weaker Ni-Nd charge transfer peak at ∼0.6 eV suggests that the hybridization between Ni 3d and Nd 5d orbitals is reduced in capped samples. From our data, capping induces only minimal differences in Nd1−xSrxNiO2 and we phenomenologically discuss these differences based on the reconstruction of the SrTiO3−NdNiO2 interface and other mechanisms such as crystalline disorder.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 11 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd0.8Sr0.2NiO2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 15 | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| La3Ni2O7 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nd6Ni5O12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Two-band model for magnetism and superconductivity in nickelates
similarity 0.96Lun-Hui Hu & Congjun Wu
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Disorder-Induced Suppression of Superconductivity in Infinite-Layer Nickelates
similarity 0.96Abhishek Ranna et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Model Construction and a Possibility of Cupratelike Pairing in a New d9 Nickelate Superconductor (Nd,Sr)NiO2
similarity 0.95Hirofumi Sakakibara et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconducting Dome in La3−xSrxNi2O7−δ Thin Films
similarity 0.95Maosen Wang et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Ternary nickel hydrides: A platform for unconventional superconductivity and quantum magnetism
similarity 0.95Mateusz Domański et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fate of magnetic impurity induced states in a non-Hermitian s-wave superconductor
similarity 0.94Chunhui Zhang & Li Sheng
Source status unknown — claims are unverified