Resisting High-Energy Impact Events through Gap Engineering in Superconducting Qubit Arrays
Matt McEwen, Kevin C. Miao, Juan Atalaya, Alexander Bilmes, Alex Crook, Jenna Bovaird, John Mark Kreikebaum, Nicholas Zobrist, Evan Jeffrey, Bicheng Ying, Andreas Bengtsson, Hung-Shen Chang, Andrew Dunsworth, Julian Kelly, Yaxing Zhang, Ebrahim Forati, Rajeev Acharya, Justin Iveland, Wayne Liu, Seon Kim, Brian Burkett, Anthony Megrant, Yu Chen, Charles Neill, Daniel Sank, Michel Devoret, Alex Opremcak
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.240601 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Quantum error correction (QEC) provides a practical path to fault-tolerant quantum computing through scaling to large qubit numbers, assuming that physical errors are sufficiently uncorrelated in time and space. In superconducting qubit arrays, high-energy impact events can produce correlated errors, violating this key assumption. Following such an event, phonons with energy above the superconducting gap propagate throughout the device substrate, which in turn generate a temporary surge in quasiparticle (QP) density throughout the array. When these QPs tunnel across the qubits’ Josephson junctions, they induce correlated errors. Engineering different superconducting gaps across the qubit’s Josephson junctions provides a method to resist this form of QP tunneling. By fabricating all-aluminum transmon qubits with both strong and weak gap engineering on the same substrate, we observe starkly different responses during high-energy impact events. Strongly gap engineered qubits do not show any degradation in T1 during impact events, while weakly gap engineered qubits show events of correlated degradation in T1. We also show that strongly gap engineered qubits are robust to QP poisoning from increasing optical illumination intensity, whereas weakly gap engineered qubits display rapid degradation in coherence. Based on these results, gap engineering mitigates the threat of high-energy impacts to QEC in superconducting qubit arrays.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Al Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Modeling phonon-mediated quasiparticle poisoning in superconducting qubit arrays
similarity 0.95E. Yelton et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dispersive measurements of superconducting qubit coherence with a fast latching readout
similarity 0.95I. Siddiqi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dephasing of a Superconducting Qubit Induced by Photon Noise
similarity 0.95P. Bertet et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Dynamics of parametric fluctuations induced by quasiparticle tunneling in superconducting flux qubits
similarity 0.95M. Bal et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Anomalous charge noise in superconducting qubits
similarity 0.94B. G. Christensen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in a superconducting quantum bit circuit
similarity 0.94G. Ithier et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified