Phase Diagram, d-Wave Superconductivity, and Pseudogap of the t−t′−J Model at Finite Temperature
Dai-Wei Qu, Qiaoyi Li, Shou-Shu Gong, Yang Qi, Wei Li, Gang Su
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.256003 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Recently, robust d-wave superconductive (SC) order has been unveiled in the ground state of the 2D t−t′−J model—with both nearest-neighbor (t) and next-nearest-neighbor (t′) hoppings—by density matrix renormalization group studies. However, there is currently a debate on whether the d-wave SC holds up strong on both t′/t>0 and t′/t<0 cases for the t−t′−J model, which correspond to the electron- and hole-doped sides of the cuprate phase diagram, respectively. Here, we exploit state-of-the-art thermal tensor network approach to accurately obtain the phase diagram of the t−t′−J model on cylinders with widths up to W=6 and down to low temperature as T/J≃0.06, pushing the boundaries of contemporary finite-T calculations. For t′/t>0, we find a domelike SC regime with a diverging d-wave pairing susceptibility, χSC∝1/Tα below a characteristic temperature Tc*. Near optimal doping, Tc* reaches its highest value of about 0.15J. Above Tc* yet below a higher crossover temperature T*, the magnetic susceptibility becomes suppressed, which can be related to the onset of pseudogap (PG) behaviors. On the other hand, for t′/t<0, we find the pairing correlations are much weaker, although there exhibits a node-antinode structure in the PG regime as observed in the hole-doped cuprates. The thermal tensor network calculations of the t−t′−J model underscore both the similarities and differences in the finite-temperature phase diagram between the fundamental model and cuprates, yielding unique insights into their intricate behaviors.
Similar papers
Phase Diagram, -Wave Superconductivity, and Pseudogap of the -- Model at Finite Temperature
similarity 0.93Dai-Wei Qu et al. · 2022 · arXiv:2211.06322
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Doping and temperature dependence of the pseudogap and Fermi arcs in cuprates from -CDW short-range fluctuations in the context of the t-J model
similarity 0.91Matías Bejas et al. · 2011 · arXiv:1102.1596
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Cuprate diamagnetism in the presence of a pseudogap: Beyond the standard fluctuation formalism
similarity 0.90Rufus Boyack et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1710.03246
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Interplay between superconductivity and flux phase in the t-J model
similarity 0.90E. Cappelluti & R. Zeyher · 1998 · arXiv:cond-mat/9808201
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phenomenological description of competing antiferromagnetism and d-wave superconductivity in high cuprates
similarity 0.90Bumsoo Kyung & A. M. -S. Tremblay · 2002 · arXiv:cond-mat/0204500
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
The cuprate phase diagram and the influence of nanoscale inhomogeneities
similarity 0.89Nader Zaki et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1708.01558
Source status unknown — claims are unverified