Comment on ‘‘Quantum limit of a flux lattice: Superconductivity and magnetic field in a new relationship’’
K. Scharnberg, C. T. Rieck
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.841 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by Tesanovic et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2425 (1989).
Similar papers
Flux-pinning energies in high-Tc superconductors
similarity 0.88E. Zeldov & N. M. Amer
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of superconductivity and spin-splitting fields in superconductor/ferromagnetic insulator bilayers of arbitrary thickness
similarity 0.86Alberto Hijano et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.15549
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin polarization and orbital effects in superconductor-ferromagnet structures
similarity 0.85A. F. Volkov et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Upper critical field in a spin-charge-separated superconductor
similarity 0.85R. G. Dias & J. M. Wheatley
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Exchange induced ordinary reflection in a single-channel superconductor-ferromagnet-superconductor junction
similarity 0.85J. Cayssol & G. Montambaux · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0404190
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coexistence of Ferromagnetism and Singlet Superconductivity via Kinetic Exchange
similarity 0.84Mario Cuoco et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified