Comment on “Quasiclassical Transport at a van Hove Singularity in Cuprate Superconductors”
R. Hlubina, T. M. Rice
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.554 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by D. M. Newns et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1695 (1994). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Similar papers
Comment on “Quasiclassical Transport at a van Hove Singularity in Cuprate Superconductors”
similarity 1.00J.-S. Zhou & J. B. Goodenough
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Preeminent Role of the Van Hove Singularity in the Strong-Coupling Analysis of Scanning Tunneling Spectroscopy for Two-Dimensional Cuprate Superconductors”
similarity 0.90Flora Onufrieva & Pierre Pfeuty
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Quasiclassical Transport at a van Hove Singularity in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.89D. M. Newns et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Single vortex tunneling in a superconducting film
similarity 0.87Ping Ao
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘‘High-field scaling behavior of thermodynamic and transport quantities of YBa2Cu3O7−δ near the superconducting transition’’
similarity 0.86M. B. Salamon & Jing Shi
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Quasiparticle Spectra around a Single Vortex in a d-Wave Superconductor”
similarity 0.86M. Franz & M. Ichioka
Source status unknown — claims are unverified