Comment on “Conductance Fluctuations in Mesoscopic Normal-Metal/Superconductor Samples”
S. G. den Hartog, B. J. van Wees
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5023 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by Klaus Hecker, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1547 (1997). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nb Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Conductance oscillation of a mesoscopic normal metal spanning unconventional and conventional superconductors
similarity 0.96Junren Shi et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Classical limit of microwave detection in atomic-sized superconducting contacts
similarity 0.94C. J. Muller et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Resistance oscillations in a Josephson-junction array in a magnetic field
similarity 0.93J. M. Kosterlitz & E. Granato
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Determination of the magnetic field dependence of the surface resistance of superconductors from cavity tests
similarity 0.93J. R. Delayen et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Logarithmic Upturn in Low-Temperature Electronic Transport as a Signature of d-Wave Order in Cuprate Superconductors
similarity 0.92Xiaoqing Zhou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
First-order phase transitions in ferromagnet/superconductor layered structures
similarity 0.92Paul H. Barsic et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified