Comment on “Orbital Paramagnetism of Electrons in Proximity to a Superconductor”
A. Fauchère, V. Geshkenbein, G. Blatter
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1796 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by C. Bruder and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5782 (1998). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Similar papers
Comment on ‘‘Zeeman effect on magnetoresistance in high-temperature superconductors’’
similarity 0.87R. S. Thompson
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Superconducting PrBa2Cu3Ox”
similarity 0.85V. N. Narozhnyi & S.-L. Drechsler
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Is There a Ferromagnet to Ferromagnetic s-Wave Superconductor Phase Transition?
similarity 0.85Yuan Zhou et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on ‘Phase memory effects in mesoscopic rings with superconducting ‘‘mirrors’’ ’
similarity 0.84P. G. N. de Vegvar & L. Glazman
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Quantum Phase Slips and Transport in Ultrathin Superconducting Wires”
similarity 0.84Ji-Min Duan
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Reply to “Comment on ‘c-axis Josephson tunneling in dx2−y2-wave superconductors’ ”
similarity 0.83Kazumi Maki & Stephan Haas
Source status unknown — claims are unverified