Enhancement of SQUID-Detected NMR Signals with Hyperpolarized Liquid Xe129 in a 1 μT Magnetic Field
J. J. Heckman, M. P. Ledbetter, M. V. Romalis
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.067601 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
We report an enhancement of proton NMR signals by a factor of 106 by cross polarization with hyperpolarized liquid Xe129 in an ultralow magnetic field of 1 μT. The NMR signals from cyclopentane, acetone, and methanol are detected using a commercial high-Tc SQUID magnetometer with a signal-to-noise ratio of up to 1000 from a single 90° tipping pulse. This technique allows a wide range of low-field NMR measurements and is promising for the detection of intermolecular scalar spin-spin couplings. Scalar intermolecular couplings can produce a shift of the average NMR frequency in a hyperpolarized sample even in the presence of rapid chemical exchange.
Similar papers
Application of superconducting quantum interference devices to nuclear magnetic resonance
similarity 0.86Ya. S. Greenberg
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
New Limit on the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of Xe129 Using He3 Comagnetometry and SQUID Detection
similarity 0.86N. Sachdeva et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Micro-coil detection of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance for nanofluidic samples
similarity 0.83Aya Shibahara et al. · 2013 · arXiv:1311.2007
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electrically tunable multi-terminal SQUID-on-tip
similarity 0.83Uri, Aviram et al. · 2017 · arXiv:1606.05088
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Characterization of Nuclear Magnetism at Ultralow and Zero Field using SQUIDs
similarity 0.83John Z. Myers et al. · 2024 · arXiv:2409.17733
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Magnetic flux in a mesoscopic SQUID controlled by nonclassical electromagnetic fields
similarity 0.83Jerzy Dajka & Jerzy Łuczka
Source status unknown — claims are unverified