Superconducting π Qubit with a Ferromagnetic Josephson Junction
T. Yamashita, K. Tanikawa, S. Takahashi, S. Maekawa
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.097001 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Solid-state qubits have the potential for the large-scale integration and for the flexibility of layout for quantum computing. However, their short decoherence time due to the coupling to the environment remains an important problem to be overcome. We propose a new superconducting qubit which incorporates a spin-electronic device: the qubit consists of a superconducting ring with a ferromagnetic π junction which has a metallic contact and a normal Josephson junction with an insulating barrier. Thus, a quantum coherent two-level state is formed without an external magnetic field. This feature and the simple structure of the qubit make it possible to reduce its size leading to a long decoherence time.
Similar papers
Superconducting pi qubit with a ferromagnetic Josephson junction
similarity 0.96T. Yamashita et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0410658
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent Quantum Dynamics of a Superconducting Flux Qubit
similarity 0.90I. Chiorescu et al. · 2003 · arXiv:cond-mat/0305461
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Enhancing decoherence times in superconducting qubits via circuit design
similarity 0.90Kaushik Mitra & C. A. R. Sá de Melo · 2010 · arXiv:1001.1701
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoherence in a superconducting flux qubit with a π-junction
similarity 0.90T. Kato et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Phase-slip flux qubits
similarity 0.89J. E. Mooij & C. J. P. M. Harmans · 2005 · arXiv:cond-mat/0508440
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Josephson Junctions with Artificial Superparamagnetic Barrier: A Promising Avenue for Nanoscale Magnetometry
similarity 0.89Ivan P. Nevirkovets et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified