Comment on “Spin Dynamics of the Electron-Doped High-Tc Superconducting Cuprates”
Thomas Dahm, Ilya Eremin
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.239701 · Physical Review Letters
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by F. Onufrieva and P. Pfeuty, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 247003 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
Similar papers
Comment on “Electronic Model for Superconductivity”
similarity 0.86Antimo Angelucci & Sandro Sorella
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Comment on “Nernst Effect in Poor Conductors and in the Cuprate Superconductors”
similarity 0.85Cigdem Capan & Kamran Behnia
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin dynamics in the stripe phase of the cuprates
similarity 0.84Brian M. Andersen & Per Hedegard · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411065
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spin dynamics in the antiferromagnetic phase for electron-doped cuprate superconductors
similarity 0.84Qingshan Yuan et al. · 2004 · arXiv:cond-mat/0411117
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fermi-liquid state in *-type LaEuSrCuO revealed via element substitution effects on magnetism
similarity 0.84Takanori Taniguchi et al. · 2020 · arXiv:2012.03529
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Spectral function and conductivity in the normal state of the cuprates: a spin fluctuation study
similarity 0.84R. Haslinger et al. · 2000 · arXiv:cond-mat/0009051
Source status unknown — claims are unverified