Structure and superconductivity in the binary Re1−xMox alloys
T. Shang, D. J. Gawryluk, J. A. T. Verezhak, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, M. Medarde, J. Mesot, T. Shiroka
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.024801 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
The binary Re1−xMox alloys, known to cover the full range of solid solutions, were successfully synthesized and their crystal structures and physical properties investigated via powder x-ray diffraction, electrical resistivity, magnetic susceptibility, and heat capacity. By varying the Re/Mo ratio, we explore the full Re1−xMox binary phase diagram, in all its four different solid phases: hcp-Mg (P63/mmc), α-Mn (I4¯3m), β-CrFe (P42/mnm), and bcc-W (Im3¯m), of which the second is noncentrosymmetric with the rest being centrosymmetric. All Re1−xMox alloys are superconductors, whose critical temperatures exhibit a peculiar phase diagram, characterized by three different superconducting regions. In most alloys, the Tc is almost an order of magnitude higher than in pure Re and Mo. Low-temperature electronic specific-heat data evidence a fully gapped superconducting state, whose enhanced gap magnitude and specific-heat discontinuity suggest a moderately strong electron-phonon coupling across the series. Considering that several α-Mn-type ReT alloys (T = transition metal) show time-reversal symmetry breaking (TRSB) in the superconducting state, while TRS is preserved in the isostructural Mg10Ir19B16 or Nb0.5Os0.5, the Re1−xMox alloys represent another suitable system for studying the interplay of space-inversion, gauge, and time-reversal symmetries in future experiments expected to probe TRSB in the ReT family.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| Re0.88Mo0.12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Re0.77Mo0.23 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Re0.6Mo0.4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Re0.4Mo0.6 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | 13 | Pressure not reported | onset |
| CePt3Si Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| CeIrSi3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Li2Pt3B Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| K2Cr3As3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YBiPt Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiC2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Y2C3 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| YPtBi Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BiPd Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PbTaSe2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Mg10Ir19B16 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Nb0.5Os0.5 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Sr2RuO4 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| PrOs4Ge12 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| LaNiGa2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| Re3W Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Superconductivity in Uniquely Strained RuO2 Films
similarity 0.97Masaki Uchida et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Superconductivity from Emerging Magnetic Moments
similarity 0.97Shintaro Hoshino & Philipp Werner
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Impurity and interface bound states in dx2−y2+idxy and px+ipy superconductors
similarity 0.96Qiang-Hua Wang & Z. D. Wang
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Electromagnetic response of a kx±iky superconductor: Effect of order-parameter collective modes
similarity 0.96S. Higashitani & K. Nagai
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Fractional Quantization of the Magnetic Flux in Cylindrical Unconventional Superconductors
similarity 0.96F. Loder et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Effects of an electronic topological transition for anisotropic low-dimensional superconductors
similarity 0.96G. G. N. Angilella et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified