Ambipolar suppression of superconductivity by ionic gating in optimally doped BaFe2(As,P)2 ultrathin films
Erik Piatti, Takafumi Hatano, Dario Daghero, Francesco Galanti, Claudio Gerbaldi, Salvatore Guastella, Chiara Portesi, Ibuki Nakamura, Ryosuke Fujimoto, Kazumasa Iida, Hiroshi Ikuta, Renato S. Gonnelli
DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.044801 · Physical Review Materials
Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval
Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.
Abstract
Superconductivity (SC) in the Ba-122 family of iron-based compounds can be controlled by aliovalent or isovalent substitutions, applied external pressure, and strain, the combined effects of which are sometimes studied within the same sample. Most often, the result is limited to a shift of the SC dome to different doping values. In a few cases, the maximum SC transition at optimal doping can also be enhanced. In this work, we study the combination of charge doping together with isovalent P substitution and strain by performing ionic gating experiments on BaFe2(As0.8P0.2)2 ultrathin films. We show that the polarization of the ionic gate induces modulations to the normal-state transport properties that can be mainly ascribed to surface charge doping. We demonstrate that ionic gating can only shift the system away from the optimal conditions, as the SC transition temperature is suppressed by both electron and hole doping. We also observe a broadening of the resistive transition, which suggests that the SC order parameter is modulated nonhomogeneously across the film thickness, in contrast with earlier reports on charge-doped standard BCS superconductors and cuprates.
Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval
| Formula | Reported Tc (K) | Pressure (GPa) | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
| BaFe2(As0.8P0.2)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(As0.79P0.21)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
| BaFe2(As0.81P0.19)2 Archive — visibility unverified Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula. | — | Pressure not reported | unknown |
Similar papers
Ambipolar suppression of superconductivity by ionic gating in optimally-doped BaFe2(As,P)2 ultrathin films
similarity 0.95Erik Piatti et al. · 2018 · arXiv:1810.02801
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Nanoscale superconducting-gap variations and lack of phase separation in optimally doped BaFe1.86Co0.14As2
similarity 0.91F. Massee et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Decoupling of the superconducting and magnetic/structural phase transitions in electron-doped BaFe2As2
similarity 0.90P. C. Canfield et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Growth of nematic susceptibility in the field-induced normal state of an iron-based superconductor revealed by elastoresistivity measurements in a 65 T pulsed magnet
similarity 0.90J. A. W. Straquadine et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Angle-resolved photoemission observation of isotropic superconducting gaps in isovalent Ru-substituted Ba(Fe0.75Ru0.25)2As2
similarity 0.90N. Xu et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified
Coherent-strained superconducting BaPb1−xBixO3 thin films by interface engineering
similarity 0.90Jinkwon Kim et al.
Source status unknown — claims are unverified