← Back to search

Microwave Meissner screening properties of proximity-coupled topological-insulator / superconductor bilayers

Seokjin Bae, Seunghun Lee, Xiaohang Zhang, Ichiro Takeuchi, Steven M. Anlage

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.124803 · Physical Review Materials

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

The proximity-coupled topological-insulator / superconductor (TI/SC) bilayer system is a representative system to realize topological superconductivity. In order to better understand this unique state and enable future applications of the TI/SC bilayer, a comprehensive characterization and understanding of the microscopic properties of the bilayer are required. In this work, a microwave Meissner screening study, which exploits a high-precision microwave resonator technique, is conducted on the SmB6/YB6 thin-film bilayers as an example TI/SC system. The study reveals spatially dependent electrodynamic screening response of the TI/SC system that is not accessible to other techniques, from which the corresponding microscopic properties of a TI/SC bilayer can be obtained. The TI thickness dependence of the effective penetration depth suggests the existence of a bulk insulating region in the TI layer. The spatially dependent electrodynamic screening model analysis provides an estimate for the characteristic lengths of the TI/SC bilayer: normal penetration depth, normal coherence length, and the thickness of the surface states.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
YB6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

6.1Pressure not reportedunknown
SmB6/YB6

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.8Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers