← Back to search

Strong correlation between ionic bonding strength and superconductivity in compressed hydrides

Xing Li, Zixuan Guo, Yansun Yao, Xiaohua Zhang, Shicong Ding, Guochun Yang

DOI 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.084805 · Physical Review Materials

T1

Active bibliographic source — not scientific approval

Bibliographic access preserves source history; it does not approve extracted materials or validate reported claims. Review warnings on each occurrence separately.

Abstract

Understanding the superconductivity in relation to chemical bonding is essential for the development of superconductors. We propose that pressure-reduced ionic bonding strength is beneficial for improving superconductivity in hydrides (negative correlation between bonding strength and critical temperature). We model ionic hydrides using a prototypical ionic lattice (CsCl-type) with simple-valence metal Li/Rb and hydrogen and control the bonding strength via external pressure. First-principles calculations reveal that the ionic bonding strength in LiH increases with pressure while its critical temperature (Tc) simultaneously decreases. A higher Tc at lower pressures is attributed to stronger electron-phonon coupling (EPC) induced by weaker ionic bonds and significant EPC contributions from mid-frequency phonons. RbH's pressure dependences of bonding strength and Tc are the reverse of those of LiH, and the EPC primarily results from high-frequency phonons. The distinct interorbital electron transition mechanism and amounts of charge transfer are responsible for the opposite trend of changes in bonding strength and superconductivity in LiH and RbH. The proposed correlation is further validated by the other six ionic hydrides. Substantial Tc change (e.g., 126.2 K at 100 GPa and 5.7 K at 300 GPa in LiH) in response to bonding strength variation reveals a key factor for designing new superconductors.

Source-reported materials — not catalogue approval

FormulaReported Tc (K)Pressure (GPa)Type
LiH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

126.2100 GPaunknown
LiH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

5.7300 GPaunknown
RbH

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—300 GPaunknown
H3S

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—200 GPaunknown
LaH10

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—250 GPaunknown
AlH3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
ScH3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
HfH2

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
VH3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
GaH3

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown
CaH4

Archive — visibility unverified

Source-occurrence policy only; no material identity or catalogue acceptance is inferred from the formula.

—Pressure not reportedunknown

Similar papers